Каспинфо февраль 2003 |
Название: Проект Баку-Тбилиси-Джейхан (на англ. яз.) Главные Пункты: * WWF предупреждает о серьезности негативных последствий проведения трубопровода Ваку-Тбилиси-Джейхан для окружающей среды региона и просит компанию БиПи/БТС пересмотреть решение о проведении трубопровода через долину Боржоми. (20.02.2003) Полный Текст Проект Баку-Тбилиси-Джейхан (на англ. яз.) Проект Баку-Тбилиси-Джейхан (на англ. яз.) *** WWF'S POSITION STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH BAKU-TBILISI-CHEYHAN PIPELINE WWF has been in intensive discussions with BP and its Georgian subsidiary BTC regarding the routing for the Baku -Tbilisi - Ceyhan pipeline particularly with respect to the proposed passage through the Qtsia -Tabatskuri Protected Area and the Borjomi - Kharagauli National Park Support Zone. WWF's prime concern is to minimize the negative social and environmental impact of the pipeline. BP/BTC has been co-operative in providing available information to WWF in order for WWF to make a proper assessment of the situation. WWF recognizes that BP has done substantial scope of work to minimize environmental risk in case spill occurs. However WWF remains extremely concerned about the potential environmental and social impacts of the pipeline in the highly sensitive Borjomi and Tabatskuri areas. The Borjomi - Kharagauli National Park, the prized Borjomi Mineral Water catchments area and the officially designated Support Zone of the National Park are areas where WWF has been very active in stimulating environmental and social improvement programs over the past 12 years. These programs include support for the National Park and the improvement of water supply, sewage and waste-disposal systems for the town of Borjomi as well as other towns and villages in the area. WWF has been able to attract funding for these projects from the German government as well as other donors. During the discussions with BP/BTC it has become very clear that a variety of major issues still surround the proposed pipeline route. Despite any planned mitigation measures in the Tabatskuri area, any oil spillage could rapidly result in widespread contamination of either Lake Tabatskuri or the Qtsia River and through the river to Lake Tsalka. Internationally renowned wetland and bird migration areas would also be seriously affected. The Qtsia-Nariani wetland is one of the largest high altitude wetland areas in the Caucasus. Following the discussions BTC/BP and WWF have agreed that BP/BTC will now work more closely with organizations in the area to develop a comprehensive management plan aimed at reducing the risk to the area of any potential oil spill. The situation in the Borjomi area is much more dramatic. WWF remains totally convinced that this area would be irreversibly damaged by any leakage of the pipeline. This would not only affect the drinking water resources of Borjomi and surrounding villages but also destroy the reputation, international standing and tourism potential of one of Georgia's most famous national treasures. In addition any potential threat to the renowned Borjomi Mineral Water springs, even if they were not directly polluted, would be immeasurable. WWF's hydro-geological experts are in total agreement with the Dutch Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment the Georgian Academy of Sciences and others that BP/BTC has not carried out sufficient research and analysis of the impacts to justify putting a pipeline through this area. The risk is aggravated by the fact that the proposed route would cross-areas of high seismic activity and frequent landslides, especially in the Kodiana section. WWF's main concern is that it would be impossible to effectively clean up any polluted stretches of the river systems and despite mitigation measures proposed by BP/BTC, the water supplies and the life of the river will be seriously affected for a period of many years. WWF's position is based on many years of experience in other countries with similar river systems. It is also worth noting that the threat to the ground and mineral water systems remains uncertain as BP/BTC have been unable to provide sufficient, reliable data to demonstrate a clear understanding of the functioning of the groundwater catchments system in Borjomi. Without this information it would be extremely difficult to put effective containment and recovery plans in place in the event of a leakage from the pipeline. In spite of WWF's serious concerns BP/BTC have no plans to carry out any further research into this issue. Given all the above information, WWF must conclude that the pipeline should not cross the Borjomi region, as the threat to the environmental, social and economic future of the area is too great. Furthermore WWF is urging BP/BTC to thoroughly re-evaluate other possible routings such as the Kara-Kaia option proposed by the Georgian Academy of Sciences and others and cannot accept BP/BTC's argument that the Borjomi route is the only possible choice. WWF has reiterated its commitment to work closely with BP/BTC and other organizations to find the least damaging routing for the pipeline. Kakha Tolordava Communications Officer WWF Caucasus Program Office |