Каспинфо
апрель 2000

[закрыть]
Название: Материалы на английском языке
Главные Пункты:
* Что говорят правительства разных стран мира об общественном мониторинге. *Дополнительные источники информации об общественном мониторинге в Интернет Из материалов семинара ИСАР по общественному экологическому мониторингу, Баку, 16-18 марта 2000 г.
(11.04.2000)


Полный Текст
Материалы на английском языке
What Governments are Saying about Community Monitoring
Web site information compiled by ISAR-DC, February 2000


AUSTRALIA
Waterwatch: National Community-based Water Quality Monitoring Program
Kate Gowland, National Facilitator
E-mail: kate.gowland@ea.gov.au
Web site: www.waterwatch.org.au

Around Australia there is a growing realization by the community that
water is a precious resource which is being abused. The impacts of
this abuse are being felt by both the natural environment and human
populations which need clean water for drinking, household purposes,
primary production and recreation.

There are many parts of Australia where water quality has declined
alarmingly. This is largely due to inappropriate landuse practices
and/or direct pollution. In a number of areas, the community, with
support from State and local governments and the private sector, is
now mobilizing to identify and monitor these impacts and to take
remedial actions. These monitoring projects are giving communities an
understanding of the need for catchment-level planning and management
as well as raising awareness of the natural environment.

The concept of managing the total environment in an ecologically
sustainable way is not new, but water quality provides an excellent
indicator of environmental "health" and therefore can help to direct
the energies of concerned communities. Species such as frogs, fish,
insects and waterbirds may also indicate declining water quality and
monitoring of these animal groups can help communities to pin-point
problem areas within a catchment.

One of the most important messages conveyed by monitoring programs is
that everything which happens in a catchment can have downstream
effects, and that all communities - both rural and urban - within each
catchment must work together to correct the problems.

Waterwatch: Communities Caring for Catchments

The program has been developed by a committee with community, State
and Federal Government representation, which was formed following a
national workshop early in 1992.

Waterwatch aims to provide a national focus for existing
community-based water quality monitoring programs such as Streamwatch
(NSW) and Ribbons of Blue (WA), and to encourage the emergence of
similar new programs.

The aims of the program are reflected in the vision for Waterwatch:

" By encouraging community participation in monitoring water quality
the Waterwatch program aims to raise community awareness of the
natural environment, instill the wise use of natural resources ethic
in communities and encourage appropriate on-ground activities in
response."

The program hopes to realize this vision through achieving the
following objectives:

· To encourage closer links between communities, their local
government, the private sector and natural resource management
agencies to create an "ownership" and understanding of water quality
problems and the need for broad-scale environmental management.
· To generate sufficient interest in water quality and general landuse
issues within the community to result in on-ground remedial action by
local government, natural resource management agencies, individuals or
groups.
· To establish a national network linking all community-based water
quality monitoring programs.
· To provide resources necessary to facilitate the careful expansion
of community-based water quality monitoring into a comprehensive
national network.
· To facilitate cooperation and information sharing in the development
of education, awareness and school curriculum material.
· To encourage national consistency in the gathering, reporting and
interpretation of water quality data.
· To provide administrative arrangements to ensure Objectives 1-6 are
achieved.

Water Quality Monitoring

What is it? Water quality monitoring means examining the physical,
chemical and biological characteristics of water - observing how these
factors change over time, and over different positions along a water
body.

Physical characteristics include for example, temperature, pH and
turbidity (i.e. the quantity of suspended solids in the water giving
it a murky or cloudy appearance). Important chemical characteristics
are the levels of nitrates, phosphates and salts in the water. An
important biological characteristic of water is the number and type of
macroinvertebrates (water bugs such as dragonflies, beetles, and even
yabbies). Different animals have different tolerances to pollution in
water, so by identifying which ones are present, and which ones are
absent, it is possible to determine how much pollution is in the
water.

By making records of these and other factors at a number of points
along local waterways it is possible for groups to build up a picture
of local water quality and also to pinpoint problem areas. Collected
data may then be exchanged through electronic networks with
neighboring groups to build up a picture of water quality through an
entire catchment - and beyond.

An important process which community-based water quality monitoring
programs hope to achieve is to translate the knowledge of any water
quality problems into constructive actions. For example this might
include tree planting and fencing of some areas of river banks to
exclude stock, or reducing the community's use of fertilizers and
pesticides.

How it Works

Each State has a Waterwatch panel which includes representatives from
government agencies and the community.

Facilitator. The panel is responsible for giving strategic direction
to the development of Waterwatch activities within its State, and for
making funding recommendations to the Waterwatch Program. In general
terms, the panel will try to match priorities with existing regional
catchment or landcare plans.

A National Facilitator based with the Environment Australia
Biodiversity Group is responsible for national coordination and
development of the program. The Waterwatch Steering Committee, which
comprises the Waterwatch facilitators from all States, assists with
this task.

Funding

Applications for funding under Waterwatch are made in the first
instance, to the appropriate State Facilitator. Much of the funding
goes towards the provision of on-ground support. In this way,
interested groups are able to obtain assistance in the setting up of a
program, including advice on the best equipment and how to use it, how
to link up with other groups in a catchment, and how to locate the
best places to monitor. In general, individual groups are expected to
purchase their own equipment. Depending on your area and requirements,
this need not be very expensive. Many groups obtain sponsorship from
local councils, businesses and other community groups for this
purpose.

________________________________________________________________________
CANADA
Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network (EMAN)
Tom Brydges, Director, Ecological Monitoring Coordinating Office
E-mail: tom.brydges@cciw.ca
Web site: www.cciw.ca/eman

The entire Canadian environment is being subjected to changing
environmental conditions such as alterations to the chemical and
physical characteristics of the atmosphere, introduction of toxic
chemicals into food chains and the effects of invasion of exotic
species.

It is certain that the biological components of the environment will
respond to these stresses. Whether the responses will be good or bad
is not always known, but for certain, things will change! It is
important for Canadians to understand how the ecosystem is responding
to these stresses since a large component of our national economy is
based on the sustainable management of resource-based industries such
as fisheries, forestry, agriculture, ecotourism and hydro electricity
generation.

Long-term, multidisciplinary research and monitoring have provided
answers to management issues such as controlling eutrophication, and
acid rain. This multidisciplinary research and monitoring must be
maintained because it is essential that decision-makers have access to
reliable information in the future, as they grapple with maintaining a
healthy economy, in the face of changing environmental conditions.

The Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network is being organized to
provide a national perspective on how Canadian ecosystems are being
affected, to provide scientifically defensible rationales for control
and management activities, to evaluate the effectiveness of control
programs, and to identify new issues as they emerge. The Network is
establishing links with similar programs in Europe, the United States
and Mexico.

The Ecological Monitoring Coordinating Office has been combined with
the Indicators group of the downsized State of Environment Reporting
Branch. The new Indicators, Monitoring and Assessment Branch (IMAB)
will play a coordinating and facilitating role in the generation of
data, the use of standard indicators, and in the production of issue-
or area-related assessments. The assessments will provide a report to
the Canadian people and decision-makers on the ecological condition of
our country.

The overall operating objective of IMAB is to promote the gathering
and use of scientific information for the policy and management
decision-making processes, and to provide a better link between the
policy requirements and the scientific community.

Volunteer Networks

EMCO has a major interest in and applying some resources to the
development of extensive volunteer networks. The participants in such
networks, as the weather network, breeding bird surveys, plant
phenology and amphibian surveys, have effectively gathered data for
decades. These programs greatly assist various Departments in
obtaining extensive environmental information. It is the objective of
EMCO to have as many as possible of these extensive networks
collecting data at EMAN sites. This will provide additional
possibilities of being able to explain any changes that are observed
in these measurements, and in turn, being able to extrapolate the
results from the EMAN sites to larger geographical areas covered by
the extensive network.

The volunteer networks are an excellent mechanism to involve the
public and to further educational aspects of environmental issues.

________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES
Environmental Protection Office - Office of Water: Monitoring Water
Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water (4101)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
E-mail: OW-GENERAL@epamail.epa.gov
Web site: www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/index.html

What Is Volunteer Monitoring?

Across the country, private citizens are learning about water quality
issues and helping protect our Nation's water resources by becoming
volunteer monitors. Volunteers are analyzing water samples for
dissolved oxygen, nutrients, pH, temperature, and a host of other
water constituents; evaluating the health of stream habitats and
aquatic biological communities; inventorying stream- side conditions
and land uses that may affect water quality; cataloging and collecting
beach debris, and restoring degraded habitats.

State and local agencies may use volunteer data to screen for water
quality problems, establish trends in waters that would otherwise be
unmonitored, and make planning decisions. Volunteers benefit from
learning more about their local water resources, identifying what
conditions or activities might be contributing to pollution problems,
and working with clubs, environmental groups, and state or local
governments to address problem areas.

What Is EPA's Role In Volunteer Monitoring?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) supports the volunteer
monitoring movement in a number of ways. It sponsors national and
regional conferences to encourage information exchange between
volunteer groups, government agencies, businesses, and educators;
publishes sampling methods manuals for volunteers; produces a
nationwide directory of volunteer programs; and through its ten
Regions, provides some technical assistance (primarily on quality
control and lab methods) and Regional coordination. Grants to States
that can be used to support volunteer monitoring in lakes and for
nonpoint source pollution control are also managed by the EPA Regions.

How Many Programs Are There?

Every year, many new volunteer monitoring programs are formed in the
United States. Some programs have as many as several thousand
volunteers. Many programs, however, are small and often affiliated
with neighborhood associations, schools or local environmental
organizations. Today, there are literally too many to count.

The fast growth of the volunteer monitoring movement is clearly shown
by increases in the number of programs that receive technical and/or
organizational support from State water quality or natural resource
agencies. In 1988, only 14 states supported such programs; by 1992, 32
states had programs and six additional states were planning to develop
programs. Over 24,000 volunteers in these state-supported programs
monitor more than 985 streams and rivers, nearly 2800 ponds, lakes,
and wetlands, and four major estuaries. In many cases, these waters
would go unmonitored if volunteers were not involved.

Who Pays For Volunteer Monitoring?

Volunteer monitoring programs are funded through a variety of sources.
In some cases, state water quality or natural resource agencies may
actually sponsor the volunteers and contribute staff, equipment, and
services such as data analysis. City and county governments do the
same. Some programs are supported by federal agencies such as the EPA
(primarily through pollution control grants to the States), the
National Park Service, and the U.S. Forest Service.

In addition, many volunteer programs receive private support through
foundations, universities and other research centers, or corporate
sponsors. This support may include funding for a full or part time
organizer, equipment, training workshops, or data analysis. In many
programs, volunteers themselves also help pay for monitoring by
purchasing their own equipment and hosting training sessions.

*****
Additional On-Line Monitoring Resources
Information compiled by ISAR-DC, February 2000


Surf Your Watershed
http://www.epa.gov/surf

Surf Your Watershed is a US Environmental Protection website devoted
to information about marshes, streams, rivers and lakes in the US. The
site offers information about watershed throughout the country,
environmental watershed programs, a database of environmental websites
and on-line discussions about water quality issues.

US National Directory of Volunteer Monitoring Programs
http://yosemite.epa.gov/water/volmon.nsf

This fifth National Directory of Volunteer Environmental Monitoring
Programs
Directory is focused primarily on monitoring of aquatic
environmentsorivers, lakes, estuaries, and wetlands. The overwhelming
majority of the nearly 800 groups listed here monitor water bodies.
Yet many do so in the context of the watershed as a whole, which means
that they monitor not just the water body itself but also the
vegetation, wildlife, and land uses in the surrounding landscape.

US National Monitoring Conference
http://NWQMC.site.net

This is the site for the National Water Quality Monitoring Council.
The NWQMC was established to implement a voluntary, integrated,
nationwide strategy to improve water resource monitoring, assessment,
and reporting. It sponsored its first conference in 1998, during which
over 400 attendees participated in workshops and discussions on a
variety of topics related to water monitoring issues. The second
conference will be held in Austin, TX April 25-27, 2000.

US National Volunteer Monitoring Conference
http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/notice.html

This is the site for "Moving into the Mainstream," the 6th National
Volunteer Monitoring Conference to be held April 26-29, 2000 in
Austin, TX. Topics to be covered at the conference include: planning,
implementing and improving your volunteer monitoring program; new
approaches and initiatives; and tools and methods.

The Volunteer Monitor:
The Newsletter of Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring
http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/volunteer/vm_index.htm
Eleanor Ely, Editor
E-mail: volmon@rivernetwork.org

The Volunteer Monitor is a twice yearly newsletter that facilitates
the exchange of ideas, monitoring methods, and practical advice among
volunteer environmental monitoring groups across the nation.
Subscriptions are free. To be added to the mailing list for hard
copies, write to the Volunteer Monitor. Several back issues are
available on-line. The newsletter has a permanent editor and a
volunteer editor board. In addition, a different monitoring group
serves as co-editor for each issue. Past topics include: school-based
monitoring; volunteer monitoring: past, present, and future; managing
and presenting your data; the wide world of monitoring.

Volunteer Monitoring Websites
http://water.nr.state.ky.us/ww/vm.htm

The list, maintained by Kentucky Water Watch, is a summary of
high-quality web sites that deal directly with the field of volunteer
monitoring. This page has links to over 60 school-based, local,
state, national and international web sites.

Watershed Education Resources on the Internet
http://www.igc.apc.org:80/green/resources.html

This page, compiled by GREEN (Global Rivers Environmental Education
Network) and EcoNet, has links to nearly 100 sites related to
watershed education and monitoring programs worldwide.